Chelsea changes managers the way cities change weather. Abruptly. Without warning. Often without patience. Enzo Maresca’s exit fits neatly into that long, bruised history. Another project cut short before the paint dried. Another reminder that Stamford Bridge remains a place where ideas are welcome, time is not, and results carry the weight of survival.
Maresca arrived with theory, structure, possession patterns and a belief that control could tame chaos. Chelsea offered him a squad bloated with youth, ambition and financial expectation, then demanded clarity before cohesion had a chance to form. When performances wobbled, the ground shifted fast. The ending felt inevitable long before it became official.
This is not a job that forgives. Chelsea managers do not grow into the role. They either impose themselves immediately or get swallowed. Graham Potter learned that the hard way. A thoughtful builder asked to sprint. A long-term thinker placed inside a short fuse. The fans turned as soon as the results dipped, and the board followed soon after.
Chelsea FC remains one of the most attractive jobs in European football and one of the most unforgiving. Elite facilities. Endless resources. A global brand. Also, relentless scrutiny, a restless fanbase and ownership that expects visible progress at speed. The next appointment must deliver substance and authority from the first whistle.
Here are the leading candidates to take on English football’s most poisoned chalice.
1. Liam Rosenior, Strasbourg
Rosenior sits at the front of the queue, and not by accident. Strasbourg have become the most convincing argument for Chelsea’s multi-club model rather than a footnote within it. Under Rosenior, they appear coherent, brave, competitive, and well-coached.
Seventh in Ligue 1, deep into European competition, punching above its weight without losing identity.
His work carries a familiarity that matters. He understands BlueCo’s internal language. He understands how recruitment flows, how development pathways are structured, and how patience is rationed. That alone places him ahead of many rivals.
On the pitch, Rosenior teams play with intent. Progressive passing without obsession. Structure without suffocation. Full-backs step into midfield. Pressing triggers are clear. Players look coached rather than choreographed. There is rhythm without rigidity.
At Chelsea, that alignment would matter. This squad needs guidance more than reinvention. It needs clarity, not another philosophical reset. Rosenior offers continuity in approach while promising sharper execution.
The concern sits elsewhere. Pulling Rosenior out of Strasbourg mid-project risks undermining the very ecosystem BlueCo claims to value. Cannibalising their own success sends a message that no role is safe once Chelsea calls. It also places Rosenior into the most hostile environment of his career without the protective distance Strasbourg provides.
He would arrive as a house choice, not a fan demand. That requires early wins. At Chelsea, credibility is rented weekly.
SEE ALSO | 15 Soccer Players Who Have Played For The Most Clubs
2. Eddie Howe, Newcastle United
In a major twist, reports on January 3rd suggest Chelsea have made “discreet moves” to sound out Howe.
This would be the most serious appointment Chelsea could make. Howe brings weight, scars and proof. Newcastle were drifting when he arrived. He gave them structure, discipline and belief. He ended a 70-year trophy drought without theatrics or noise. He built a side that competes, adapts and survives pressure.
Howe understands the Premier League grind better than most. He knows how dressing rooms fracture. He knows how expectations distort reality. He knows how to coach improvement rather than promise transformation.
His work with young players stands out. Howe improves individuals while strengthening the collective. He raises floors and ceilings together. That fits Chelsea’s squad profile perfectly.
This would also represent a philosophical shift from Chelsea’s recent habit of chasing potential over certainty. Howe brings stability, not romance. Authority without arrogance. Calm without softness.
The obstacle is obvious. Newcastle will not release him cheaply or easily. He is central to their identity and future. Chelsea would need to break resistance financially and politically. Even then, the question lingers whether Howe would trade a patient project for Stamford Bridge volatility.
If Chelsea wants immediate credibility inside the league, this is the move. It would signal seriousness rather than experimentation.
3. Cesc Fàbregas, Como
Emotion will always cling to Fàbregas at Chelsea. He remains one of the sharpest football minds the club has known. As a coach, he carries that same intelligence into his work at Como. Promotion achieved. Serie A survival secured. A team that plays with courage rather than fear.
His coaching reflects his playing career. Control through angles. Tempo as a weapon. Possession with purpose. Players understand their zones and responsibilities. Como rarely looks confused, even when outmatched.
Chelsea’s hierarchy admires him. His understanding of the game, his communication skills, and his alignment with long-term squad building appeal to decision makers.
Yet this is not a fairytale environment. Fàbregas is still learning. Chelsea FC does not allow learning curves. Mistakes are amplified. Losses metastasise into crises. His connection to the club would offer initial goodwill, but sentiment expires quickly at Stamford Bridge.
There is also the complication of ownership. Fàbregas is part-owner at Como. Untangling that relationship would require legal gymnastics and high cost. More importantly, leaving a controlled environment for chaos might stall his trajectory rather than accelerate it.
The idea makes sense emotionally. The timing does not.
SEE ALSO | 10 of the Best Soccer Players of 2025
4. Oliver Glasner, Crystal Palace
Glasner arrives with silverware and authority. Winning the FA Cup with Crystal Palace elevated his standing across England. Palace under Glasner are disciplined, aggressive and tactically adaptable. They defend with conviction and attack with direct intent.
He carries a European pedigree from Eintracht Frankfurt and understands knockout football, pressure moments and tactical adjustments. Players respect him. Boards listen to him. Results follow him.
Glasner does not sell ideology. He sells solutions. His teams shift shapes comfortably, often using a back three that allows wide overloads and central compactness. That system has brought Palace into the top six contention and forced bigger clubs to adjust.
At Chelsea, that flexibility would be tested. The current squad is assembled primarily for a back four with inverted full-backs and high interior control. Switching systems midstream would require buy-in, adaptation and likely recruitment.
Glasner also demands backing. His recent frustrations at Palace stem from recruitment limitations. Chelsea spends freely, but alignment is never guaranteed. He would expect authority rather than guidance.
This appointment would be bold, pragmatic and demanding. Chelsea would need to meet him halfway.
5. Roberto De Zerbi, Marseille
De Zerbi remains one of the most fascinating coaches in Europe. His football seduces and terrifies in equal measure. Build up patterns that invite pressure. Vertical passing that slices lines. Risk is embraced as philosophy rather than consequence.
Chelsea admired him long before Maresca arrived. Interviews were held. Interest was serious. Brighton became his stage, Marseille his next experiment.
At Marseille, the same traits persist. High tempo. Emotional intensity. Tactical daring. Fans adore the spectacle. Opponents fear the chaos.
The appeal is obvious. Chelsea’s young technical players would thrive under his principles. The squad suits his demands more than many realise.
The concern is relational. De Zerbi challenges boards. He demands autonomy. He pushes back. His personality is combustible. Chelsea dismissed Maresca partly due to internal friction. Replacing him with De Zerbi risks repeating the cycle with higher volume.
This would be the most entertaining option and the most volatile. Success would be explosive. Failure would be public and swift.
SEE ALSO | Top 10 Premier League Players Whose Contracts Expire in 2026
6. Andoni Iraola, Bournemouth
Iraola’s reputation has been earned quietly and honestly. Bournemouth, under his guidance punches above their budget, press relentlessly and competes without apology. Record points totals did not arrive through luck. They arrived through structure and belief.
His teams are physically prepared, tactically modern and brave in possession. Pressing is coordinated rather than chaotic. Transitions are ruthless. Smaller clubs struggle to cope with the intensity.
At Chelsea, that intensity could unlock players who drift between potential and impact. The squad is young, athletic and capable of sustaining high demands.
Recent form has cooled enthusiasm slightly, though context matters. Bournemouth operate within limits. Chelsea do not.
The bigger question is authority. Iraola has not managed at a club where losing two matches triggers a national debate. Chelsea magnifies pressure beyond football. That environment breaks some coaches before systems take root.
Still, this would be a football-driven appointment rather than a marketing one.
7. Xavi Hernández, Free Agent
Xavi carries gravity. Players listen when he speaks. The dressing rooms are quiet when he enters. His Barcelona tenure unfolded amid chaos and constraint, yet he delivered a league title under impossible conditions.
He understands possession, positional play and pressure. He has navigated media storms, political interference and fan expectation. Few candidates arrive with that resilience.
As a free agent, he offers immediate availability. No compensation. No negotiations with rival clubs.
The hesitation lies in fit. Chelsea’s ownership has favoured emerging coaches aligned with their recruitment strategy. Xavi brings stature that demands compromise. He would expect control over style, selection and influence over recruitment.
He also represents a cultural shift. Chelsea’s recent appointments have leaned toward theory and projection. Xavi brings legacy and authority.
If Chelsea wants a figurehead who commands respect instantly, this is the clearest option. Whether ownership wants that presence remains unclear.
SEE ALSO | 10 of the Worst Injuries in Premier League History
The Reality Check
Chelsea FC do not need another concept. They need command. The squad is talented enough to compete now. The infrastructure exists. What has been missing is stability and authority sustained beyond a few bad weeks.
This appointment will reveal everything about Chelsea’s direction.
- Rosenior suggests continuity within the BlueCo model.
- Howe signals ambition grounded in experience.
- De Zerbi signals spectacle and risk.
- Xavi signals stature and confrontation.
Chelsea remains a club at war with time. Whoever steps into the role must win quickly, manage upward confidently and survive the noise.
The margins are thin. The consequences are loud. Stamford Bridge waits, impatient as ever.
