£75m for Savinho is one of the most outrageous Premier League transfer fees of the summer, and when the number is placed next to Omar Marmoush, Eintracht Frankfurt’s reported sell-on interest and Tottenham’s simultaneous negotiations with Manchester City, it becomes very difficult to look at the deal and simply shrug.
The reported structure is already raising eyebrows. Tottenham are set to pay £75m upfront for Savinho, with another £10m potentially available in add-ons, while negotiations over Marmoush are continuing separately. Reuters and Sky Sports both report the £75m initial figure, with Sky putting the full package at £85m.
And here is the part that makes the whole thing so deliciously suspicious.
Is Manchester City effectively hiding part of Marmoush’s transfer value inside Savinho’s fee to reduce what they might owe Eintracht Frankfurt through a sell-on clause?
That is the question.
Not an established fact. Not proof of wrongdoing. But a question that has become increasingly difficult to ignore when the two transfers are being negotiated together, and the numbers are moving in ways that make Savinho look extraordinarily expensive.
Because £75m for Savinho is already wild.
£75m for Savinho while Marmoush potentially leaves for a comparatively modest fee is where the alarm bells start ringing.
£75m for 2 Premier League Goals
Let’s start with the football.
Savinho is talented. Nobody seriously disputes that.
He was outstanding at Girona, where his acceleration, close control, dribbling and ability to attack defenders made him one of the most exciting young players in Spain, and Manchester City were smart enough to get him into their wider system before his value exploded.
But there is a rather uncomfortable little statistic sitting underneath this £75m deal.
Savinho has scored two Premier League goals for Manchester City.
Two.
He has made 50 Premier League appearances for City, meaning Tottenham are effectively paying £37.5m for every Premier League goal he has scored for the club if you divide the initial £75m fee by those two goals.
That is an absolutely brutal number.
Of course, Savinho is not a striker, and judging a winger purely by goals would be ridiculous, particularly when his game revolves around carrying the ball, beating defenders, creating chances and stretching defensive structures.
But even after allowing for all of that, £75m is an enormous amount of money for a player who has never established himself as a regular, dominant Premier League starter.
Last season, he appeared in 24 league matches for City. Yet, his role remained inconsistent, with the Brazilian still fighting for minutes and struggling to turn his considerable ability into sustained production.
And now Tottenham are apparently prepared to make him their record signing.
That is where this starts looking less like a normal transfer and more like Manchester City’s latest masterclass in selling.
SEE ALSO | Every Premier League Club’s Record Transfer Sale In History
City Have Just Found Gold Again
There is a reason Manchester City will be laughing all the way to the bank if this deal goes through.
City acquired Savinho for around £21m according to reported transfer figures, although the wider City Football Group structure and the player’s development pathway make the accounting picture more complicated. Current transfer databases put the fee at approximately £21m.
Now Tottenham are handing City £75m upfront, with another £10m in possible additions.
That is potentially £85m for a player City bought for roughly £21m.
Even before considering wages, amortisation and accounting treatment, that is a staggering increase in headline transfer value.
And this is exactly what Manchester City have become frighteningly good at doing.
They recruit early.
They develop.
They give players exposure to elite football.
Then, when another club decides it wants the player badly enough, City sell at a premium.
Savinho is the latest example.
And Tottenham, rather generously, have decided to pay the premium.
SEE ALSO | Ter Stegen: The Keeper Born in the Wrong Timeline
Is City Cooking The Books?
This is the question that deserves to sit right in the middle of the story.
Are Manchester City and Tottenham manipulating the valuation of Savinho and Marmoush so that a larger portion of the combined transfer money is assigned to Savinho, thereby reducing City’s potential obligation to Frankfurt?
Again, nobody has produced the contract.
Nobody has publicly established the exact wording of Frankfurt’s alleged sell-on clause.
Nobody has proved that the two clubs have deliberately shifted money from one player to another.
But the timing is extraordinary.
Tottenham are negotiating for two Manchester City players at the same time.
One is Savinho, a 22-year-old winger with two Premier League goals and limited starting experience, for whom Spurs are reportedly paying £75m upfront.
The other is Marmoush, a player City reportedly paid around £59m to sign from Frankfurt, who arrived in England with a much stronger recent scoring record and considerable European pedigree.
And suddenly the player with the smaller Premier League reputation is carrying the enormous £75m price tag.
You can understand why people are asking whether something else is happening behind the scenes.
The theory is brutally simple.
Suppose Tottenham are willing to spend a huge combined amount on both players.
Instead of putting the largest portion of that money against Marmoush, where Frankfurt’s contractual interest could potentially bite, the clubs could theoretically place more of the value against Savinho.
Marmoush leaves for less.
Savinho leaves for considerably more.
City still receive roughly the amount they wanted from Tottenham.
And Frankfurt potentially receives less from whatever sell-on mechanism it possesses.
If that is what happened, is that clever transfer structuring or an attempt to circumvent a contractual obligation?
That is the uncomfortable question.
Football’s Financial Gymnastics Have Become Ridiculous
This is hardly the first time transfer fees have been structured creatively.
Football clubs routinely negotiate guaranteed fees, bonuses, appearance payments, performance incentives, sell-on percentages, buy-back clauses and other mechanisms that can make the headline number look very different from the amount actually changing hands immediately.
That is normal football finance.
But there is a line between negotiating creatively and deliberately misrepresenting the economic reality of a transaction.
If Savinho really is worth £75m to Tottenham independently of Marmoush, then fine.
City have every right to sell him for £75m.
If Marmoush is worth £40m, £50m or £60m to Tottenham independently of Savinho, then that is the price.
But if the two clubs have effectively agreed that Tottenham will pay £160m for the pair and then deliberately allocate the money in a way designed to deprive Frankfurt of money it is contractually entitled to receive, that becomes a very different conversation.
And that is precisely why the structure matters.
SEE ALSO | Premier League 2026/27 Transfer: Every Deal, Every Club
City Are Not Exactly Short of Money
Manchester City’s outgoing business has been extraordinary.
The club has generated huge sums from player sales over the Guardiola era, including from players who barely featured or never established themselves at first-team level.
Savinho is another enormous capital gain.
Marmoush could be another.
Nico González could potentially be another.
The bigger picture is a Manchester City squad undergoing another major transformation while simultaneously generating enormous transfer income.
The club has spent heavily too, so this is not some simple story about City selling everyone and pocketing the money.
But the ability to sell players for huge fees gives them something most clubs cannot replicate.
They can make mistakes and still recover.
They can buy a player for £20m, decide he is not right for the next project, and sell him for £70m.
They can replace him; they can move on. They can keep the machine running.
That is why Savinho’s £75m price tag is less embarrassing for City than it is for Tottenham.
City have done their job; they have found a buyer.
Tottenham are the ones holding the cheque.
Nelli Cost Less
And this is where the whole Premier League transfer market starts looking completely bonkers.
Arsenal’s Gabriel Martinelli is reportedly attracting offers in the region of £34m to £38m, with Arsenal considering their position while Galatasaray and other clubs show interest.
Martinelli is 25.
He has scored 62 goals in 278 appearances for Arsenal and has years of Premier League football behind him.
He has played Champions League football; he has won major honours.
He has been a key part of one of the best Arsenal teams of the modern era, yet his market value is hovering around £40m.
Savinho has two Premier League goals; £75m.
Martinelli: around £40m.
Come on.
The market can explain the difference through age, contract length, wages, tactical fit and potential resale value, but there is still something deeply funny about watching an established Premier League winger struggle to command £40m while an exciting City squad player suddenly becomes an £85m asset.
EPL clubs be crazy.
And Manchester City appear to be the club that understands this madness better than everyone else.
SEE ALSO | 10 Record-Breaking Transfers That Turned Into Massive Flops
The Frankfurt Question Will Not Disappear
If Frankfurt’s sell-on clause exists, however, the German club will have every reason to pay close attention to the final paperwork. The important issue will not juat be the total amount Tottenham pays Manchester City.
It will be how that amount is contractually allocated.
If Savinho is genuinely valued at £75m and Marmoush is genuinely valued at whatever Tottenham eventually pay for him, then there may be nothing remotely controversial about the structure.
But if the combined economic value of the transaction is being deliberately shifted between the two players to reduce a third party’s contractual entitlement, that would be far more serious.
That is why the question needs to remain hanging over the deal.
Are City cooking the books by hiding Marmoush’s transfer value inside Savinho’s fee?
Because if that is what is happening, it would be one of the more audacious examples of transfer-market financial gymnastics we have seen.
And if it is not happening, City should have no problem explaining why a player with two Premier League goals is suddenly worth £75m upfront while another player they bought for roughly £59m can be moved in a separate but simultaneous transaction without raising the same valuation questions.
Verdict
Savinho may become worth £75m; he may become worth £100m. He could eventually make Tottenham look like geniuses.
Right now, though, £75m upfront is outrageous.
It is one of the most aggressive Premier League fees of the summer, and the fact that another Manchester City attacker is being negotiated alongside him makes the numbers even harder to swallow.
For Savinho alone, Tottenham appear to be paying an enormous premium for potential.
For City, it looks like another magnificent sale.
And for anyone watching the Marmoush negotiations from Frankfurt, the question is much more uncomfortable.
Is Savinho really worth £75m to Tottenham, or has the Brazilian’s price become the convenient place to park a chunk of money that would otherwise have been attached to Marmoush?
Because if Tottenham are genuinely prepared to spend around £160m on Savinho and Marmoush, while Savinho carries £75m to £85m of that total, then someone needs to explain why the younger player with two Premier League goals has suddenly become the financial heavyweight of the pair.
And while we are at it, somebody should explain the Martinelli market too.
£75m for Savinho. Around £40m for Martinelli.
Premier League football has officially lost the plot.
Or perhaps Manchester City have simply figured out how to make everyone else pay for it.
